Watts v. State
440 So. 2d 627, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24198
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watts v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 450 So. 2d 265 →
Opinion
Although the trial court orally stated that appellant had violated three conditions of his probation, the court’s written order of probation revocation did not specify which conditions had been violated. This cause is remanded to the trial court for correction of the written order to reflect the conditions of probation violated by appellant. See Brown v. State, 429 So.2d 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). In all other respects, the order is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watts v. State, 440 So. 2d 627, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24198 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
440 So. 2d 627 (Watts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. State
429 So. 2d 821 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)