Watts v. Sanders

103 S.E. 851, 25 Ga. App. 542, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 63
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 28, 1920
Docket11612
StatusPublished

This text of 103 S.E. 851 (Watts v. Sanders) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watts v. Sanders, 103 S.E. 851, 25 Ga. App. 542, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 63 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence as disclosed by the record, the verdict for the defendant was amply authorized, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial shows cause for a reversal of the judgment below.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Action on contract; from city court of Greensboro — Judge Brown. May 14, 1920. Miles W. Lewis, for plaintiff. J. G. Faust, Noel P. Park, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 S.E. 851, 25 Ga. App. 542, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-sanders-gactapp-1920.