Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corporation
152 N.E. 425, 242 N.Y. 557, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1085
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.; His cock, Ch. J., McLaughlin and Lehman, JJ., dissent, on the ground that purported market reports were improperly received as evidence of prices.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corporation, 152 N.E. 425, 242 N.Y. 557, 1926 N.Y. LEXIS 1085 (N.Y. 1926).
152 N.E. 425 (Watts v. Phillips-Jones Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Global Minerals & Metals Corp. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
306 A.D.2d 154 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Pro Travel, Inc.
239 A.D.2d 233 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Airlines Reporting Corp. v. S & N Travel, Inc.
238 A.D.2d 292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
College Management Co. v. Belcher Oil Co.
159 A.D.2d 339 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Alicea
254 N.E.2d 915 (New York Court of Appeals, 1969)
Garcia & Diaz, Inc. v. Trans World Refining Corp.
25 Misc. 2d 604 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Isbrandtsen Co. v. Lyncroft Grain Corp.
8 Misc. 2d 521 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1957)
In re the Arbitration between Eimco Corp. & Deering, Milliken & Co.
6 Misc. 2d 422 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)