Watts v. Phenix Insurance

68 S.E. 479, 134 Ga. 717, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 338
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 30, 1910
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 68 S.E. 479 (Watts v. Phenix Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watts v. Phenix Insurance, 68 S.E. 479, 134 Ga. 717, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 338 (Ga. 1910).

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

A lire policy on a storehouse recited that it was made subject to the following stipulations and conditions, among others: that the, entire policy should he void “if the interest of the insured he other than unconditional and sole ownership; or if the subject of insurance be a building on ground not owned by the insured in fee simple; or if any change, other than by death of the insured, take place in the interest, title, or possession of the subject of insurance (except change of occupants without increase of hazard), whether by legal process or judgment, or voluntary act of the insured, or otherwise.” When the. policy was issued the insured was the sole owner, in fee, of both the building and the land upon which it was situated. Subsequently, and without the consent of the insurance company, he sold and conveyed, in fee, to another an undivided one-half interest in the land upon which the building [718]*718was situated, the deed reciting that the grantor reserved “full title to the storehouse now on said lot with the right to remove the same without let or hindrance from” the grantee. Such was the status of affairs when, during the life of the policy, the building was destroyed by fire. Held, that such sale and conveyance constituted such a change in tlie interest of the insured in the building as voided the policy.

June 30, 1910. Action upon insurance policy. Before Judge Reagan. Butts superior court. March 29, 1909. John R. L. Smith, for plaintiff. Slaton & Phillips, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Providence Washington Insurance v. Pass
12 S.E.2d 460 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)
Hurley v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance
183 S.E. 548 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1936)
Pooser v. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd.
182 S.E. 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
National Ben Franklin Fire Insurance v. Hurley
176 S.E. 780 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Hurley v. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance
176 S.E. 785 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 S.E. 479, 134 Ga. 717, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-phenix-insurance-ga-1910.