Watts v. Evans
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-60665 Summary Calendar __________________
ALBERT JAMES WATTS,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
BILLY RAY EVANS,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi (4:95-CV-14LN) ______________________________________________
April 11, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Albert James Watts, a Mississippi state prisoner, appeals the
district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Sheriff
Evans in this civil rights suit in which Watts alleged an Eighth
Amendment excessive force claim. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We affirm for
the following reasons.
Watts failed to rebut with any competent summary judgment
proof Evans' showing that there was no material issue of fact
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. regarding Watts' having "some injury." See Rankin v. Klevenhagen,
5 F.3d 103, 108 (5th Cir. 1993). Further, we do not consider
Watts' claim that he suffers emotional problems because he raises
it for the first time on appeal. Varnado v. Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320,
321 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watts v. Evans (Watts v. Evans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.