Watts v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.

289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 685, 337 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1072
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 5, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[687]*687Order affirmed, with costs. Viewed in terms of its general use as a public way open to vehicular traffic, there is little doubt but that the interdictions detailed by both Vehicle and Traffic Law (§ 1210, subd. [a]) and section 435-17.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York apply to the subject street, a marginal street then under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Marine and Aviation. The order appealed from should be affirmed.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co., 289 N.E.2d 180, 31 N.Y.2d 685, 337 N.Y.S.2d 260, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1072 (N.Y. 1972).

289 N.E.2d 180 (Watts v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lieberman v. City of New York
52 A.D.3d 719 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Bethesda Armature Co. v. Sullivan
424 A.2d 397 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1981)
Podstupka v. Brannon
81 Misc. 2d 338 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)