Watts v. Biggs

157 S.W.3d 373, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 402, 2005 WL 525127
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 8, 2005·No. ED 84541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Danny Watts, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants, Loyd H. Biggs and Rock Road Trailer Parts & Sales, Inc., on Mr. Watts’s breach-of-contract and breaeh-of-warranty claims against the defendants stemming from Mr. Watts’s purchase of a motor home. Mr. Watts alleges the trial court’s judgment is against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. Biggs, 157 S.W.3d 373, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 402, 2005 WL 525127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

157 S.W.3d 373 (Watts v. Biggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Brown
157 S.W.3d 373 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)