Watts v. Biggs

157 S.W.3d 373, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 402, 2005 WL 525127
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 8, 2005
DocketED 84541
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.W.3d 373 (Watts v. Biggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watts v. Biggs, 157 S.W.3d 373, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 402, 2005 WL 525127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, Danny Watts, appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of the defendants, Loyd H. Biggs and Rock Road Trailer Parts & Sales, Inc., on Mr. Watts’s breach-of-contract and breaeh-of-warranty claims against the defendants stemming from Mr. Watts’s purchase of a motor home. Mr. Watts alleges the trial court’s judgment is against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Brown
157 S.W.3d 373 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.W.3d 373, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 402, 2005 WL 525127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-v-biggs-moctapp-2005.