Watts v. Andion

69 A.D.2d 901, 416 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11652
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 1979·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated January 30, 1978, as, upon reargument, adhered to the court’s original determination denying his motion for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and, upon reargument, motion for a general preference granted. Where, as here, “the injuries, prima facie established by medical proof, might warrant a recovery in excess of’ $10,000, the jurisdictional limitation of the Civil Court of the City of New York, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny a general preference (see Coletto v Keogh, 44 AD2d 712). Suozzi, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watts v. Andion, 69 A.D.2d 901, 416 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11652 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

69 A.D.2d 901 (Watts v. Andion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D'Alessio v. Arias
81 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Marrone v. Pathmark Supermarket
81 A.D.2d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)