Watts Ex Rel. Copeland v. Keuhn

262 S.W.3d 260, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2008 WL 2962086
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 5, 2008
DocketWD 68397
StatusPublished

This text of 262 S.W.3d 260 (Watts Ex Rel. Copeland v. Keuhn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watts Ex Rel. Copeland v. Keuhn, 262 S.W.3d 260, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2008 WL 2962086 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

James H. Watts filed a medical malpractice claim against David J. Keuhn, M.D., and the Missouri Valley Physicians (Defendants) for failing to diagnosis his strep throat which led to rheumatic fever. Watts claimed that the Defendants were negligent in failing to follow up a rapid strep test with a throat culture. Following a lengthy trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendants. Watts now appeals, alleging that the trial court erred in allowing the admission of evidence of a file review that had been conducted by the *261 Defendants at Watts’s request. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 S.W.3d 260, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1039, 2008 WL 2962086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watts-ex-rel-copeland-v-keuhn-moctapp-2008.