Wattleton v. Holder

599 F. App'x 2
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wattleton v. Holder. Read the opinion of the Court — 534 F. App'x 3
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 4, 2015·No. No. 14-5217·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed July 18, 2014 and August 20, 2014 be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the complaint and denied reconsideration of that dismissal because appellant has previously presented the same claim, which has been rejected on the merits.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wattleton v. Holder, 599 F. App'x 2 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

599 F. App'x 2 (Wattleton v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.