Wattleton v. Beeler

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 2, 2005
Docket05-6586
StatusUnpublished

This text of Wattleton v. Beeler (Wattleton v. Beeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wattleton v. Beeler, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6586

DAVID WATTLETON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ARTHUR F. BEELER, Warden, FMC-Butner; STEPHEN WILLIAMS, Institutional Counselor, FMC-Butner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-05-52-5)

Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 2, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Wattleton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Wattleton appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Wattleton v. Beeler,

No. CA-05-52-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wattleton v. Beeler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wattleton-v-beeler-ca4-2005.