Watt v. . Johnston
This text of 48 N.C. 124 (Watt v. . Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a sovre facias against the defendant as special bail for Solomon McCullough and Taliaferro Hunter.
Upon executing the writ in the original suit, the defendant took the bond, a copy of which is set forth in the case. That bond, in the opinion of the Court, under the cases of Rhodes and Vaughan, 2 Hawks. 167, and Clark and Walker, 3 Ire. 181, is a bail-bond. The plaintiff, at the return term of the writ, deeming it not a bail-bond, did not except to it, nor notify the defendant. Hie Act under which the proceedings are had requires, that when a bail-bond is taken, and duly returned, “ upon exception taken and entered at the same term to which such process shall be returnable, the sheriff, or other officer, having due notice thereof, shall be deemed and stand as special bail.” The plaintiff having failed to except to the bond in due time, and, not having notified the defendant, cannot subject him as special bail.
No exception has been taken to the scire facias.
There is no error, in tlie judgment ‘ below, and it is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 N.C. 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watt-v-johnston-nc-1855.