Watt v. Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Watt v. Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc.

292 So. 2d 56, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7715

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1083

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 So. 2d 56 (Watt v. Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watt v. Bill Branch Chevrolet, Inc., 292 So. 2d 56, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7715 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DENYING REHEARING

MANN, Chief Judge.

We granted a motion to dismiss an appeal improvidently taken from an order of the Circuit Court dismissing a counterclaim within the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction but brought in an action originally filed in the County Court for a sum lower than the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction. We are now asked to reconsider our action because the appellant fears that his right to appeal will be lost. We decline to do so. His right of appeal is preserved in any case by the Florida Constitution, Article V, §§ 3, 4, 5, F.S.A.

The appellant states that confusion exists now because the Circuit Court has transferred the cause back to the County Court, leaving an appeal to be taken to the Circuit Court eventually which would submit the question which he brought here to the very court which decided it. Having once entertained jurisdiction on a good faith claim which causes the action to be transferred to the Circuit Court, that court should have retained jurisdiction. National Juice Corporation v. Gilligan, Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 914; Rule 1.170(j) Fla.R.Civ.R, 30 F.S.A. Our action is without prejudice to further proceedings in the light of this opinion.

The appeal will stand dismissed and the petition for rehearing is denied.

BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING REHEARING

MANN, Chief Judge.

We granted a motion to dismiss an appeal improvidently taken from an order of the Circuit Court dismissing a counterclaim within the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction but brought in an action originally filed in the County Court for a sum lower than the Circuit Court’s jurisdiction. We are now asked to reconsider our action because the appellant fears that his right to appeal will be lost. We decline to do so. His right of appeal is preserved in any case by the Florida Constitution, Article V, §§ 3, 4, 5, F.S.A.

The appellant states that confusion exists now because the Circuit Court has transferred the cause back to the County Court, leaving an appeal to be taken to the Circuit Court eventually which would submit the question which he brought here to the very court which decided it. Having once entertained jurisdiction on a good faith claim which causes the action to be transferred to the Circuit Court, that court should have retained jurisdiction. National Juice Corporation v. Gilligan, Fla. 1953, 63 So.2d 914; Rule 1.170(j) Fla.R.Civ.R, 30 F.S.A. Our action is without prejudice to further proceedings in the light of this opinion.

The appeal will stand dismissed and the petition for rehearing is denied.

BOARDMAN and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 So. 2d 56, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watt-v-bill-branch-chevrolet-inc-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack