Watt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

239 S.W.3d 132, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1602
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 2007·No. ED 89515·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Courtney Watt (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Defendant-Respondent American Family Insurance Company’s (“American Family”) Motion to Dismiss Count I of Plaintiffs First Amended Petition, Vexatious Refusal to Pay. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the *133 claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 239 S.W.3d 132, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1602 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

239 S.W.3d 132 (Watt v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reid v. State
239 S.W.3d 132 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)