Watson v. Zimmerman
This text of 6 Cal. 46 (Watson v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.
To enable the plaintiff to recover in an action of ejectment founded on prior possession, he must allege and prove an actual ouster by defendants or those under whom he holds. Treadwell v. Paine & Dewey, 5 Cal. R., 9. The complaint in this case contains no such allegation, and under our system of pleadings this is such a defect as cannot be cured by a default taken against defendant through the mistake or inadvertence of his counsel.
The judgment is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 Cal. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-zimmerman-cal-1856.