Watson v. Watson
4 Rand. 611
Opinion
This-appeal was docketed in the names-of Richard M. Scott and others, against Josiah Watson and others. Richard M. Scott, by his counsel, moved to have the appeal dismissed as to him, upon the allegation that the suit was originally taken without his knowledge or consent. To prove this, he filed sundry affidavits. The Court made a rule on the appellees, to shew cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as to Richard M. Scott; and reasonable notice being given of the rule; It was ordered, that the appeal should be dismissed as to him.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Watson, 4 Rand. 611 (Va. Ct. App. 1827).
4 Rand. 611 (Watson v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Franklin v. Peers
29 S.E. 321 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1898)