Watson v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Watson v. Watson

4 Rand. 611

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia

DecidedFebruary 15, 1827

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 Rand. 611 (Watson v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Watson, 4 Rand. 611 (Va. Ct. App. 1827).

Pincite

Opinion

This-appeal was docketed in the names-of Richard M. Scott and others, against Josiah Watson and others. Richard M. Scott, by his counsel, moved to have the appeal dismissed as to him, upon the allegation that the suit was originally taken without his knowledge or consent. To prove this, he filed sundry affidavits. The Court made a rule on the appellees, to shew cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as to Richard M. Scott; and reasonable notice being given of the rule; It was ordered, that the appeal should be dismissed as to him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This-appeal was docketed in the names-of Richard M. Scott and others, against Josiah Watson and others. Richard M. Scott, by his counsel, moved to have the appeal dismissed as to him, upon the allegation that the suit was originally taken without his knowledge or consent. To prove this, he filed sundry affidavits. The Court made a rule on the appellees, to shew cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as to Richard M. Scott; and reasonable notice being given of the rule; It was ordered, that the appeal should be dismissed as to him.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Rand. 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-watson-vactapp-1827.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack