Watson v. Watson

Michigan Supreme Court

Watson v. Watson

11 N.W. 227, 47 Mich. 427, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 657

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1882

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 N.W. 227 (Watson v. Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Watson, 11 N.W. 227, 47 Mich. 427, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 657 (Mich. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment entered put an end to the action, and the objection that it is not subject to review on case made is not tenable. The defendant moved on affidavit to set aside the writ by which the suit was commenced on the ground that the name assumed by the plaintiff was not the true one, and the court entertained the motion and set the writ aside and then entered the judgment complained of. The proceeding was irregular.

The objection, if it had any foundation, was required to be raised by plea and it was error to decide the question on motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The judgment entered put an end to the action, and the objection that it is not subject to review on case made is not tenable. The defendant moved on affidavit to set aside the writ by which the suit was commenced on the ground that the name assumed by the plaintiff was not the true one, and the court entertained the motion and set the writ aside and then entered the judgment complained of. The proceeding was irregular.

The objection, if it had any foundation, was required to be raised by plea and it was error to decide the question on motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 N.W. 227, 47 Mich. 427, 1882 Mich. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-watson-mich-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack