Watson v. Tippen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Watson v. Tippen

279 So. 2d 697, 1973 La. LEXIS 6166

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 29, 1973

DocketNo. 53683

StatusPublished

This text of 279 So. 2d 697 (Watson v. Tippen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Tippen, 279 So. 2d 697, 1973 La. LEXIS 6166 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Harold E. Watson, individually and as administrator of the estates of his minor sons, Barry and Scott Watson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 277 So.2d 700.

Application denied. The judgment is correct.

TATE, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted since the rationale is inconsistent with those in Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 227 La. 364, 79 So.2d 483 (1955) and Hickman v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 262 La. 102, 262 So.2d 385 (1972).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Harold E. Watson, individually and as administrator of the estates of his minor sons, Barry and Scott Watson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 277 So.2d 700.

Application denied. The judgment is correct.

TATE, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted since the rationale is inconsistent with those in Amyx v. Henry & Hall, 227 La. 364, 79 So.2d 483 (1955) and Hickman v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 262 La. 102, 262 So.2d 385 (1972).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 So. 2d 697, 1973 La. LEXIS 6166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-tippen-la-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack