Watson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Watson v. State

1921 OK CR 141, 198 P. 98, 19 Okla. Crim. 303, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Okla. Crim. 377 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided July 30, 1921·No. No. A-3699.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Link Watson, was convicted on an information charging the selling of four quarts of whisky to one G. T. Berry, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for six months and a fine of $500., *304 From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. The proof on the part of the state showing the sale of the whisky as charged is conclusive and uncontroverted. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal herein is destitute of merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Link Watson, was convicted on an information charging the selling of four quarts of whisky to one G. T. Berry, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the county jail for six months and a fine of $500., *304 From the judgment rendered on the verdict, he appeals. The proof on the part of the state showing the sale of the whisky as charged is conclusive and uncontroverted. An examination of the record discloses that the appeal herein is destitute of merit. The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Watson v. State, 1921 OK CR 141, 198 P. 98, 19 Okla. Crim. 303, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 25 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

1921 OK CR 141 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.