Watson v. State

1911 OK CR 490, 118 P. 1118, 6 Okla. Crim. 673, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 519
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 7 Okla. Crim. 590
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 21, 1911·No. No. A-952.·Published

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiff in error, W. T. Watson, was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory law, and was, on the 17th day of August, 1910, sentenced to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of one hundred dollars. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error. Por this reason the Attorney General has filed a motion to affirm for failure to prosecute the appeal. The motion is sustained, and the judgment of the county court of Seninole count is therefore affirmed, and the cause remanded with direction to enforce the judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 1911 OK CR 490, 118 P. 1118, 6 Okla. Crim. 673, 1911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 519 (Okla. Ct. App. 1911).

1911 OK CR 490 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.