Watson v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Watson v. State of Florida

696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1997 WL 395233

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 16, 1997

DocketNo. 96-1813

StatusPublished

This text of 696 So. 2d 546 (Watson v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. State of Florida, 696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1997 WL 395233 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s Confession of Error we reverse the order of the trial court denying the Appellant’s Motion for Return of Property. As conceded by the State, “nothing in the record on appeal reflects that the items sought to be returned were used by the [Appellant] as burglary tools in the case before the trial court.”

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant the Motion for Return of Property.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Upon the State’s Confession of Error we reverse the order of the trial court denying the Appellant’s Motion for Return of Property. As conceded by the State, “nothing in the record on appeal reflects that the items sought to be returned were used by the [Appellant] as burglary tools in the case before the trial court.”

Reversed and remanded with instructions to grant the Motion for Return of Property.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

696 So. 2d 546, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 8165, 1997 WL 395233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-1997.