Watson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watson v. State

477 S.W.3d 688, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 8227819

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 8, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102295

StatusPublished

This text of 477 S.W.3d 688 (Watson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. State, 477 S.W.3d 688, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 8227819 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gene Watson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terry Gene Watson appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k); Burston v. State, 343 S.W.3d 691, 693 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 S.W.3d 688, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2015 WL 8227819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack