Watson v. State

264 S.W.3d 655, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1006, 2008 WL 2884626
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1998
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 29, 2008·No. WD 67819·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Tom Watson appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief after an eviden-tiary hearing. After pleading guilty to five counts of sodomy, § 566.060, RSMo 1990, Appellant was sentenced in Jackson County Circuit Court to twenty years in the Missouri Department of Corrections, with the sentence on two of the counts to be served consecutively. Appellant now claims that there was an insufficient factual basis to support his guilty plea, and that his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to object to the insufficient factual basis and for failing to call *656 certain character witnesses to testify at Appellant’s sentencing.

We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 264 S.W.3d 655, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1006, 2008 WL 2884626 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

264 S.W.3d 655 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.