Watson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Watson v. State

144 S.E. 142, 38 Ga. App. 435, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 272

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 31, 1928·No. 19029·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

“It not appearing from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge within twenty days of the judgment excepted to (the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial), this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the ease.” Hutchins v. State, 35 Ga. App. 395 (133 S. E. 266). See Tuggle v. State, 30 Ga. App. 671 (118 S. E. 778).

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. Robert B. Williamson, for plaintiff in error. W. 0. Forehand,'solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworti-i, J.

“It not appearing from the bill of exceptions and the record that the bill of exceptions was presented to the trial judge within twenty days of the judgment excepted to (the overruling of the defendant’s motion for a new trial), this court is without jurisdiction to entertain the ease.” Hutchins v. State, 35 Ga. App. 395 (133 S. E. 266). See Tuggle v. State, 30 Ga. App. 671 (118 S. E. 778).

Writ of error dismissed.

Broyles, G. J., and Luke, J., concur. Robert B. Williamson, for plaintiff in error. W. 0. Forehand,'solicitor, contra.

Watson v. State, 144 S.E. 142, 38 Ga. App. 435, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 272 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

144 S.E. 142 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related