Watson v. State
44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 83, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 454
Opinion
The alleged impeaching evidence was not of such a character as to authorize a reversal of the judgmentof the courtbelowfor refusing to charge the law in regard to impeachment, in the a bsence of a written request for such a charge. There was no error in the charge of which complaint is made. The alleged newly discovered evidence was merely cumulative in character. There was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction of the accused ; and the court below did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. State, 44 S.E. 824, 118 Ga. 83, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 454 (Ga. 1903).
44 S.E. 824 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Summerour v. State
68 S.E.2d 158 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1951)
McCue v. State
170 S.W. 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)