Watson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Watson v. State

162 So. 3d 255, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2986, 2015 WL 903713

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 4, 2015

DocketNo. 3D14-2033

StatusPublished

This text of 162 So. 3d 255 (Watson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. State, 162 So. 3d 255, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2986, 2015 WL 903713 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mickel Watson appeals from the summary denial of his June 6, 2014, motion to correct illegal sentence, arguing that he was illegally sentenced to a fifty-year prison term on his conviction for the misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer without violence. In response to our order to show cause, the State stated Watson’s original sentence contained a scrivener’s error transposing the sentence imposed on three counts and this error has since been corrected. Because the corrected sentence was not made part of the record in this appeal, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively showing Watson is not entitled to relief. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mickel Watson appeals from the summary denial of his June 6, 2014, motion to correct illegal sentence, arguing that he was illegally sentenced to a fifty-year prison term on his conviction for the misdemeanor charge of resisting an officer without violence. In response to our order to show cause, the State stated Watson’s original sentence contained a scrivener’s error transposing the sentence imposed on three counts and this error has since been corrected. Because the corrected sentence was not made part of the record in this appeal, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court for attachment of records conclusively showing Watson is not entitled to relief. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D).

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 So. 3d 255, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 2986, 2015 WL 903713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-state-fladistctapp-2015.