Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Watson v. State

Watson v. State

115 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2149643, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8041
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Watson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 7035 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 17, 2013·No. No. 1D13-1494·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that petitioner only recently sought leave to amend his motion for postconviction relief to add an additional claim, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED as premature.

CLARK, MARSTILLER, and SWANSON, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 115 So. 3d 1021, 2013 WL 2149643, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8041 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

115 So. 3d 1021 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.