Watson v. State

923 S.W.2d 871, 325 Ark. 193, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 379
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided June 24, 1996·No. CR 96-425·Published

Opinion

Per CURIAM.

Appellant Robert Watson, by his attorney, has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, John E Stroud III, admits that the failure to file the record in time was due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5, 1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

DUDLEY, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. State, 923 S.W.2d 871, 325 Ark. 193, 1996 Ark. LEXIS 379 (Ark. 1996).

923 S.W.2d 871 (Watson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.