Watson v. Shell Oil Co.
990 F.2d 805, 1993 WL 133329
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 28, 1993·No. No. 91-3449·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion December 7, 1992, 5 Cir., 1992, 979 F.2d 1014)
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Shell Oil Co., 990 F.2d 805, 1993 WL 133329 (5th Cir. 1993).
990 F.2d 805 (Watson v. Shell Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco Company
84 F.3d 734 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
Troy Watson v. Shell Oil Company, and Brown & Root, U.S.A., Inc., Robert Adams, Sr. v. Shell Oil Company, and Brown & Root, U.S.A., Inc.
990 F.2d 805 (Fifth Circuit, 1993)