Watson v. Richards

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Watson v. Richards

1929 OK 133, 279 P. 328, 137 Okla. 299, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 457

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 19, 1929

Docket18182

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1929 OK 133 (Watson v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Richards, 1929 OK 133, 279 P. 328, 137 Okla. 299, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 457 (Okla. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

HUNT, J.,

The identical question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in 'error herein in No. 17993, Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrister et al., in an opinion by this court filed on the 17th day of April, 1928, 137 Okla. 227, 278 Pac. 653, following the rule announced in No. 18265, Levina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, 137 Okla. 265, 278 Pac. 648. Said eases are controlling here and decisive of the questions presented in this appeal.

It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents. HEFNER, J., not participating. MASON, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HUNT, J.,

The identical question here involved was decided adversely to the contention of plaintiff in 'error herein in No. 17993, Anna Eva Jacobs, nee Carney, v. Sallie E. Ambrister et al., in an opinion by this court filed on the 17th day of April, 1928, 137 Okla. 227, 278 Pac. 653, following the rule announced in No. 18265, Levina Cooper, nee Perry, v. Spiro State Bank, 137 Okla. 265, 278 Pac. 648. Said eases are controlling here and decisive of the questions presented in this appeal.

It therefore follows that the judgment appealed from herein must be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, CULLI-SON, SWINDALL, and ANDREWS, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents. HEFNER, J., not participating. MASON, C. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1929 OK 133, 279 P. 328, 137 Okla. 299, 1929 Okla. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-richards-okla-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack