Watson v. Rheingold
This text of 270 A.D.2d 18 (Watson v. Rheingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paula Omansky, J.), entered April 27, 1999, dismissing the complaint and bringing up for review an order which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground of collateral estoppel, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The complaint alleging legal malpractice was properly dismissed on the ground that a judgment in another action rejecting plaintiffs claim for disability payments upon a finding that his injury was caused by a pre-existing medical condition necessarily precludes a finding in this action that but for defendant’s negligence the jury in the underlying action would have found that the same injury was caused by plaintiffs fall over a negligently placed wastepaper basket. We note in particular the decision of the appellate court in the other action affirming the trial court’s finding that “even if appellant’s allegation of falling was true, it was not related in any manner to his disability” (Watson v American Home Assur. Co., 454 Pa Super 293, 304, 685 A2d 194, 199, lv denied 549 Pa 704, 700 A2d 443). Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Tom, Lerner, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D.2d 18, 703 N.Y.S.2d 188, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-rheingold-nyappdiv-2000.