Watson v. Raab

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Watson v. Raab

84 N.Y.S. 972

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedNovember 18, 1903

StatusPublished

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 972 (Watson v. Raab) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Raab, 84 N.Y.S. 972 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant fails to substantiate his counterclaim by the fair preponderance of evidence which the law requires. His contention that the plaintiff agreed to allow him $5 per month for storage of machinery is not sustained by clear 'and explicit evidence of an agreement to do so, and his contention loses much force and effect from the fact that he paid full rent month after month for four years without making the deduction which he now claims .he had a right to make.

Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant fails to substantiate his counterclaim by the fair preponderance of evidence which the law requires. His contention that the plaintiff agreed to allow him $5 per month for storage of machinery is not sustained by clear 'and explicit evidence of an agreement to do so, and his contention loses much force and effect from the fact that he paid full rent month after month for four years without making the deduction which he now claims .he had a right to make.

Judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-raab-nyappterm-1903.