Watson v. Porzel
27 A. 866, 158 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1625
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 14, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 253·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
There was no error in admitting in evidence the paper referred to in the first specification of error. Its execution was admitted, and it was clearly evidence of an original undertaking by the defendants’ testator, John Kaiser, to pay for the goods therein specified, upon their delivery to J. A. Miller. Nor was there any error in directing the jury to find in favor of the plaintiffs. Neither of the specifications is sustained.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Watson v. Porzel, 27 A. 866, 158 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1625 (Pa. 1893).
27 A. 866 (Watson v. Porzel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sechler v. Baughman
98 Pa. Super. 406 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Lieberman v. Colahan
110 A. 246 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1920)
Columbia Baking & Manufacturing Co. v. Schissler
35 Pa. Super. 621 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)
Kaufman v. Abeles
11 Pa. Super. 616 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1899)