Watson v. Porzel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Watson v. Porzel

27 A. 866, 158 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1625

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 14, 1893

DocketAppeal, No. 253

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 27 A. 866 (Watson v. Porzel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Porzel, 27 A. 866, 158 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1625 (Pa. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubtam,

There was no error in admitting in evidence the paper referred to in the first specification of error. Its execution was admitted, and it was clearly evidence of an original undertaking by the defendants’ testator, John Kaiser, to pay for the goods therein specified, upon their delivery to J. A. Miller. Nor was there any error in directing the jury to find in favor of the plaintiffs. Neither of the specifications is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubtam,

There was no error in admitting in evidence the paper referred to in the first specification of error. Its execution was admitted, and it was clearly evidence of an original undertaking by the defendants’ testator, John Kaiser, to pay for the goods therein specified, upon their delivery to J. A. Miller. Nor was there any error in directing the jury to find in favor of the plaintiffs. Neither of the specifications is sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A. 866, 158 Pa. 513, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-porzel-pa-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack