Watson v. Police Department

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Watson v. Police Department

279 A.D.2d 354, 718 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 399

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 18, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 354 (Watson v. Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Police Department, 279 A.D.2d 354, 718 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 399 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered February 8, 2000, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a determination of respondent New York City Police Department, dated June 3, 1999, denying petitioner’s application for appointment as a special patrolman, dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The circumstances underlying petitioner’s record of arrests, to the extent set forth in the administrative record, provided a rational basis for respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for appointment as a special patrolman (see, Administrative Code of City of NY § 14-106; 38 RCNY 13-01 [d], [e]). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered February 8, 2000, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to vacate a determination of respondent New York City Police Department, dated June 3, 1999, denying petitioner’s application for appointment as a special patrolman, dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The circumstances underlying petitioner’s record of arrests, to the extent set forth in the administrative record, provided a rational basis for respondent’s denial of petitioner’s application for appointment as a special patrolman (see, Administrative Code of City of NY § 14-106; 38 RCNY 13-01 [d], [e]). Concur— Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 354, 718 N.Y.S.2d 853, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-police-department-nyappdiv-2001.