Watson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Watson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission·Decided December 19, 2001·No. I.C. NO. TA-16121·Published

Opinion

The undersigned have reviewed the evidence of record in this matter and find that plaintiff did not refile this claim by September 25, 2001 as prescribed in Commissioner's Ballance's February 16, 2001 letter.

It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff's claim be DISMISSED with prejudice.

This the 14th day of December 2001.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The undersigned have reviewed the evidence of record in this matter and find that plaintiff did not refile this claim by September 25, 2001 as prescribed in Commissioner's Ballance's February 16, 2001 letter.

It is therefore ORDERED that plaintiff's claim be DISMISSED with prejudice.

This the 14th day of December 2001.

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

CONCURRING:

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Watson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Watson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction (Watson v. N.C. Dept. of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.