Watson v. Morton

1 How. Pr. 166
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 166 (Watson v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. Morton, 1 How. Pr. 166 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Jewett, Justice

Denied the motion, on the ground that under the rules no notice to the opposite party or his attorney, was necessary, of signing and filing a report of referees. Defendants’ attorney mistook the practice.

Decision.—Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-morton-nysupct-1845.