Watson v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Watson v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority

198 A.D.2d 501, 605 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 198 A.D.2d 501 (Watson v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Authority, 198 A.D.2d 501, 605 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated July 24, 1991, which, upon an order of the same court, dated June 25, 1991, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated July 24, 1991, which, upon an order of the same court, dated June 25, 1991, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether she sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed (see, Insurance Law § 5104 [a]; Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230). Mangano, P. J., Rosenblatt, Lawrence and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

198 A.D.2d 501, 605 N.Y.S.2d 937, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-metropolitan-suburban-bus-authority-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack