Watson v. Mattox

Indiana Supreme Court

Watson v. Mattox

3 Blackf. 490, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 65

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided December 9, 1834·Published

Opinion

ASSUMPSIT by Mattóx against John H. Watson and Henry Allen, for a quantity of plank sold and ■ delivered. Plea, the general issue. There was'some evidence of Watson’s acknowledgment of his having received the plank; but there was no proof of any liability on the part of Allen.

Held, that this being an action on a contract against two persons, and there being no evidence except as to one of them, the plaintiff could not recover. 1 Chitt. Pl. 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ASSUMPSIT by Mattóx against John H. Watson and Henry Allen, for a quantity of plank sold and ■ delivered. Plea, the general issue. There was'some evidence of Watson’s acknowledgment of his having received the plank; but there was no proof of any liability on the part of Allen.

Held, that this being an action on a contract against two persons, and there being no evidence except as to one of them, the plaintiff could not recover. 1 Chitt. Pl. 50.

Watson v. Mattox, 3 Blackf. 490, 1834 Ind. LEXIS 65 (Ind. 1834).

Pincite

3 Blackf. 490 (Watson v. Mattox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.