Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Watson v. Magill

Watson v. Magill

97 A. 43, 85 N.J. Eq. 592, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1916·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8. For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. Magill, 97 A. 43, 85 N.J. Eq. 592, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416 (N.J. 1916).

97 A. 43 (Watson v. Magill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blachowski v. Blachowski
39 A.2d 94 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Montgomery v. Varley
144 A. 183 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Meyers v. Meyers
134 A. 95 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Abbe v. Donohue
107 A. 431 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1919)