Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Watson v. Magill

Watson v. Magill

97 A. 43, 85 N.J. Eq. 592, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 6, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 97 A. 43 (Watson v. Magill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. Magill, 97 A. 43, 85 N.J. Eq. 592, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416 (N.J. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion hied in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Learning.

For affirmance—Swayzb, Trenchakd, Bergen, Kalisch^ Black, White, Teehune, Williams—8. For reversal—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Parker, Min-turn, Vredenburgi-i, Heppenheimer, Taylor—7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blachowski v. Blachowski
39 A.2d 94 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Montgomery v. Varley
144 A. 183 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)
Meyers v. Meyers
134 A. 95 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1926)
Abbe v. Donohue
107 A. 431 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 A. 43, 85 N.J. Eq. 592, 1916 N.J. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-magill-nj-1916.