Watson v. Lofland
This text of 4 Del. 60 (Watson v. Lofland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—By the 8th section of the general ditch law (9 vol. 468,) the managers of any ditch company are authorized to make the ditches, and employ the laborers; and all payments are to be made by orders drawn by the managers on the treasurer. The treasurer is required by section 9, to give bond and security conditioned for the faithful performance of his trust and duty, and the payment of any money in his hands as treasurer, over to his successor, at the expiration of his office.
The liability to laborers for their wages is therefore on the part of the managers, and not on the part of the treasurer, at least before the acceptance of orders, which must be drawn by both managers, or the treasurer is not bound to accept or pay them. If he refuse to accept orders properly drawn on him by the managers, the treasurer is liable to them on his bond; but he is not liable to the holders of such orders, between whom and him there is no privity, and no obligation or promise express or implied, to pay the wages. If the orders be not accepted, they should be returned to the managers, who would be responsible on their contract with the laborers for the amount of wages. If accepted, the treasurer would be liable on his" acceptance.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Del. 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-lofland-delsuperct-1843.