Watson v. James

Missouri Court of Appeals

Watson v. James

875 S.W.2d 556, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 1994 WL 133103

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 19, 1994·No. No. 64237·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s order increasing his child support obligation to $408 per month per child. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.-16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would have no precedential value; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Father appeals the trial court’s order increasing his child support obligation to $408 per month per child. We find the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.-16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would have no precedential value; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Watson v. James, 875 S.W.2d 556, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 638, 1994 WL 133103 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

875 S.W.2d 556 (Watson v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.