Watson v. Inman

596 So. 2d 1282, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1992 WL 84151
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 28, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2134
StatusPublished

This text of 596 So. 2d 1282 (Watson v. Inman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. Inman, 596 So. 2d 1282, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1992 WL 84151 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants complain that relief from execution, in the form of a stay on an ore tenus motion, was granted the appellee without compliance with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.550(b). The record is devoid of the required motion for stay, notice of hearing and order granting a stay based on evidence and applicable substantive law. See Valdosta Milling Co. v. Garretson, 54 So.2d 196 (Fla.1951); H. Trawick, Florida Practice and Procedure, Relief from Executions § 27-2 (1991 ed.).

For the reasons stated, the stay is vacated and the cause is remanded for further consistent proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valdosta Milling Co. v. Garretson
54 So. 2d 196 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
596 So. 2d 1282, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 4934, 1992 WL 84151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-inman-fladistctapp-1992.