Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

20 So. 2d 800, 155 Fla. 354, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 541
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 So. 2d 800 (Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 20 So. 2d 800, 155 Fla. 354, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 541 (Fla. 1944).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case we have before us the same questions involved in the case of J. Tom Watson, as Attorney General of Florida, v. Spessard L. Holland, as Governor of Florida, J. M. Lee, as Comptroller of Florida, J. Edwin Larson, as Treasurer of Florida, and Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of Florida and the said Holland, Lee, Larson and Mayo, as members of and collectively constituting a majority of the trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, and Arnold Oil Explorations, Inc., a Florida Corporation, decided at this term.

The final decree of the circuit court should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and. judgment in the case of J. Tom Watson, as Attorney General, v. Holland, et al., supra. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SE-BRING, JJ., and HUTCHISON and MURPHREE, Circuit Judges, concur. BUFORD, C. J., disqualified. ADAMS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bagley v. State
119 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 So. 2d 800, 155 Fla. 354, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-humble-oil-refining-co-fla-1944.