Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

20 So. 2d 800, 155 Fla. 354, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 541
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided December 19, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this case we have before us the same questions involved in the case of J. Tom Watson, as Attorney General of Florida, v. Spessard L. Holland, as Governor of Florida, J. M. Lee, as Comptroller of Florida, J. Edwin Larson, as Treasurer of Florida, and Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of Florida and the said Holland, Lee, Larson and Mayo, as members of and collectively constituting a majority of the trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of the State of Florida, and Arnold Oil Explorations, Inc., a Florida Corporation, decided at this term.

The final decree of the circuit court should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and. judgment in the case of J. Tom Watson, as Attorney General, v. Holland, et al., supra. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, BROWN, CHAPMAN, THOMAS and SE-BRING, JJ., and HUTCHISON and MURPHREE, Circuit Judges, concur. BUFORD, C. J., disqualified. ADAMS, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 20 So. 2d 800, 155 Fla. 354, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 541 (Fla. 1944).

20 So. 2d 800 (Watson v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bagley v. State
119 So. 2d 400 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)