Watson v. Guest
This text of 41 Tex. 559 (Watson v. Guest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants in error move to dismiss this case for want of a bond, either costs, or for a supersedeas.
Upon examination of the record, it is found that Watson brought suit for land, as guardian of one heir and as next friend of another. A judgment is rendered against him for costs, he having failed in the action. It styles him guardian, and makes no distinction in rendering the judgment between the capacity in which he sues as guardian and [560]*560as next friend. This, however, in respect to this motion, is not material, as he would be required to give a bond for a writ of error or appeal in either capacity. The statute exempts executors and administrators, but not guardians, from giving bond in such cases. (Pas. Dig., art. 1503.) We have been able to find no statute or decision of our court authorizing a guardian to appeal or obtain a writ of error in an ordinary suit without a bond.
Writ of error will therefore be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 Tex. 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-guest-tex-1874.