Watson v. Gaylord

Connecticut Superior Court

Watson v. Gaylord

1 Root 137

DecidedSeptember 15, 1789

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 137 (Watson v. Gaylord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Gaylord, 1 Root 137 (Colo. Ct. App. 1789).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondent on the second day of the court filed his complaint; alleging that more than lawful interest was included in, and secured by said mortgage, and prayed the aid of the petitioner’s oath; the petitioner objected to receiving it: The court on consideration determined that as the petition was in chancery, the defendant had right to answer or hie his cross-bill, and to Lave tbe benefit of the petitioner’s oath.

The petitioner objected against being examined on oatb touching said usury, because if true it would expose him to a penalty: But by the court the objection was overruled, and the petitioner withdrew his petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondent on the second day of the court filed his complaint; alleging that more than lawful interest was included in, and secured by said mortgage, and prayed the aid of the petitioner’s oath; the petitioner objected to receiving it: The court on consideration determined that as the petition was in chancery, the defendant had right to answer or hie his cross-bill, and to Lave tbe benefit of the petitioner’s oath.

The petitioner objected against being examined on oatb touching said usury, because if true it would expose him to a penalty: But by the court the objection was overruled, and the petitioner withdrew his petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-gaylord-connsuperct-1789.