Watson v. French

2 Conn. Super. Ct. 34
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1788
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 34 (Watson v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. French, 2 Conn. Super. Ct. 34 (Colo. Ct. App. 1788).

Opinion

And,

By the whole. Court:

The plaintiff’s right to prosecute the information submitted, being founded on a personal injury done to him, he might legally discontinue it on receiving satisfaction, and had right to submit it for ascertaining the injury and damages notwithstanding its being founded on a penal statute.—The arbitrators were warranted by the submission in admitting the plaintiff to be a witness, and excluding the defendants. And this procedure was also conformable to the statute on which the information was brought, which, from the necessity of the case admits the complainant to testify; and there was the fame reason for his admission on a trial before arbitrators, as before a court of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Conn. Super. Ct. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-french-connsuperct-1788.