Watson v. Fedex Ground Package System

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois
DecidedJanuary 13, 2025
Docket3:23-cv-03552
StatusUnknown

This text of Watson v. Fedex Ground Package System (Watson v. Fedex Ground Package System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Watson v. Fedex Ground Package System, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

DANA WATSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 23-CV-03552-SPM

FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.,

Defendant.

CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER McGLYNN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on a Motion for Entry of Protective Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) filed by Defendant Federal Express Corporation, successor by merger to FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx”). (See Doc. 46). FedEx indicates that pro se Plaintiff Dana Watson does not consent to the entry of any protective order in this case. (See id., ¶ 6). The Court has determined that the terms set forth herein are appropriate to protect the respective interests of the parties, the public, and the Court. However, the Court finds that the protective order shall not include a liquidated damages provision, as this Court is not required to issue liquidated damages under Federal Rule 26(c). See, e.g., Hystad Ceynar Mins., LLC v. XTO Energy, Inc., No. 1:23-CV-00030, 2024 WL 418133, at *1–2 (D.N.D. Jan. 5, 2024); Sony Comput. Ent. Am., Inc. v. NASA Elecs. Corp., 249 F.R.D. 378, 381 (S.D. Fla. 2008). Accordingly, for good cause shown, FedEx’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Therefore, the Court ENTERS the following Protective Order. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties, non-party signatories, and non- party witnesses shall follow the procedures set forth below with respect to certain documents, information, or testimony provided or exchanged in this or related actions or proceedings:

1. Scope. All materials produced or adduced in the course of discovery, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), shall be subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as defined below. This Order is subject to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on matters of procedure and calculation of time periods. 2. Confidential Information. As used in this Order, “Confidential

Information” means information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” by the producing party that falls within one or more of the following categories: (a) information prohibited from disclosure by statute; (b) information that reveals trade secrets; (c) research, technical, commercial or financial information that the party has maintained as confidential; (d) medical information concerning any individual; (e) personal identity information, such as dates of birth, social security numbers, and

financial account numbers; (f) income tax returns (including attached schedules and forms), W-2 forms and 1099 forms; (g) personnel or employment records of a person who is not a party to the case; (h) names and contact information of current and/or former employees or residents/patients of Defendant; or (i) financial records, work records, and/or sales data/information pertaining to any individual or party. Each of the aforesaid categories of information and documents is likely to be at issue in this matter, and all of the aforesaid categories of information and documents concern private and confidential information of parties and non-parties alike. Information or documents that are available to the public may not be designated as Confidential

Information.

3. Designation. (a) A party may designate a document as Confidential Information for protection under this Order by placing or affixing the words “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” on the document and on all copies in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. As used in this Order, “copies” includes

electronic images, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions that contain Confidential Information. The marking “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” shall be applied prior to or at the time of the documents are produced or disclosed. Applying the marking “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” to a document does not mean that the document has any status or protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this Order. Any copies that are made of any documents

marked “CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” shall also be so marked, except that indices, electronic databases or lists of documents that do not contain substantial portions or images of the text of marked documents and do not otherwise disclose the substance of the Confidential Information are not required to be marked. (b) Either party may mark any document it believes contains confidential or proprietary information as “Confidential Information” in accordance with the provisions of this Order.

4. Depositions. Deposition testimony is protected by this Order only if designated as “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” on the record at the time the testimony is taken. Such designation shall be specific as to the portions that contain Confidential Information. Deposition testimony so designated shall be treated as Confidential Information protected by this Order until fourteen (14) days after delivery of the transcript by the court reporter to any party or the witness. Within fourteen (14) days after delivery of the transcript, a designating party

may serve a Notice of Designation to all parties of record identifying the specific portions of the transcript that are designated Confidential Information, and thereafter those portions identified in the Notice of Designation shall be protected under the terms of this Order. The failure to serve a timely Notice of Designation waives any designation of deposition testimony as Confidential Information that was made on the record of the deposition, unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

5. Protection of Confidential Material. (a) General Protections. Confidential Information shall not be used or disclosed by the parties, counsel for the parties or any other persons identified in subparagraph (b) for any purpose whatsoever other than in this litigation, including any appeal thereof. (b) Limited Third-Party Disclosures. The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit the disclosure of any Confidential Information to any third person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)–(9). Subject to these

requirements, the following categories of persons may be allowed to review Confidential Information: (1) Counsel. Counsel for the parties and employees of counsel who have responsibility for the action; (2) Parties. Individual parties and employees of a party but only to the extent counsel determines in good faith that the employee’s assistance is reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation in which the information

is disclosed; (3) The Court and its personnel; (4) Court Reporters and Recorders. Court reporters and recorders engaged for depositions; (5) Contractors. Those persons specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making copies of documents or organizing or processing documents,

including outside vendors hired to process electronically stored documents; (6) Consultants and Experts. Consultants, investigators, or experts employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the preparation and trial of this action but only after such persons have completed the certification contained in Attachment A, Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement to Be Bound; (7) Witnesses at depositions. During their depositions, witnesses in this action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary. Witnesses shall not retain a copy of documents containing Confidential Information, except witnesses

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Watson v. Fedex Ground Package System, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-fedex-ground-package-system-ilsd-2025.