Watson v. Dun

Ohio Supreme Court

Watson v. Dun

1 Wright 741, 1 Ohio Ch. 741

DecidedNovember 15, 1834

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Wright 741 (Watson v. Dun) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Dun, 1 Wright 741, 1 Ohio Ch. 741 (Ohio 1834).

Pincite

Opinion

COLLETT, C. J.

instructed the jury, that if they were satisfieff,from the evidence, that Dun has substituted Watson for the $600 worth of land in the place of McKay, and had afterwards refused to convey the land, that excused Watson from making any other demand of the deed, and gave him the right to resort at once to his suit, and if that were the case, they sho'uld find for the plaintiff the $600, with interest from the demand and refusal.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $783 and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COLLETT, C. J.

instructed the jury, that if they were satisfieff,from the evidence, that Dun has substituted Watson for the $600 worth of land in the place of McKay, and had afterwards refused to convey the land, that excused Watson from making any other demand of the deed, and gave him the right to resort at once to his suit, and if that were the case, they sho'uld find for the plaintiff the $600, with interest from the demand and refusal.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $783 and judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Wright 741, 1 Ohio Ch. 741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-dun-ohio-1834.