Watson v. Cornell

California Supreme Court

Watson v. Cornell

52 Cal. 644

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1878

DocketNo. 5774

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Cal. 644 (Watson v. Cornell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Watson v. Cornell, 52 Cal. 644 (Cal. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant May 3rd, 1877. Notice of appeal was served and filed July 18th, 1877. The Clerk certifies * * * “ that a good and sufficient undertaking on appeal in due form of law has been executed, and is now on file in said action in my office.”

Respondent moved to dismisa the appeal.

By the Court ;

The record does not contain a copy of the undertaking on appeal, nor does the certificate of the Clerk, so far as it relates to the undertaking on appeal, conform to sec. 953 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Appeal dismissed, without prejudice to-another-appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant May 3rd, 1877. Notice of appeal was served and filed July 18th, 1877. The Clerk certifies * * * “ that a good and sufficient undertaking on appeal in due form of law has been executed, and is now on file in said action in my office.”

Respondent moved to dismisa the appeal.

By the Court ;

The record does not contain a copy of the undertaking on appeal, nor does the certificate of the Clerk, so far as it relates to the undertaking on appeal, conform to sec. 953 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Appeal dismissed, without prejudice to-another-appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cal. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/watson-v-cornell-cal-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack