Watson v. City of Milwaukee

82 N.W. 692, 107 Wis. 328, 1900 Wisc. LEXIS 219
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided September 25, 1900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The following opinion was filed May 15, 1900:

Winslow, J.

All the errors assigned in this case are-based upon rulings made upon the trial, hence they cannot, be reviewed in the absence of a bill of exceptions. No such bill has been returned to this court, although the printed' casé contains what purports to be a copy of a regularly settled bill of exceptions. We cannot, however, consider it,, as the record contains no bill, and we cannot go beyond the record. Upon the record returned, the only question open is whether the pleadings and the verdict sustain the judgment. Wille v. Bartz, 88 Wis. 424. It is apparent that they do, and hence the judgment must be affirmed.

By the Court.— Judgment affirmed.

A motion for a rehearing was denied September 25,1900.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Watson v. City of Milwaukee, 82 N.W. 692, 107 Wis. 328, 1900 Wisc. LEXIS 219 (Wis. 1900).

82 N.W. 692 (Watson v. City of Milwaukee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Manufacturing Co. v. Stallmann
107 N.W. 662 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)